(Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Env. Since the demise of the substantive due process analysis of Lochner v. New York (1905) 198 U.S. 45 [49 L.Ed. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. is one of the largest medical groups in the nation with over 9,000 physicians, 22 medical centers, numerous clinics throughout Northern and Central California and a 75-year tradition of providing quality medical care. Law (8th ed. 12 [38 Cal.3d 156], [8] Nonetheless, for several reasons relating to the specific facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court judgment should not be reversed on this ground. L.Rev. Insurance is a device for spreading risks and costs among large numbers of people so that no one person is crushed by misfortune. While the majority have upheld the various provisions of MICRA out of deference to the Legislature, it is unlikely that such ad hoc judicial adjustments to the act will ultimately produce a result that is more respectful of the Legislature than a clear-cut constitutional invalidation followed by a legislative revision of the scheme. Rapid Transit District, supra, 2 Cal.3d 1, we acknowledged that most legal commentators had severely criticized the rule for affording a plaintiff a "double recovery" for "losses" he [38 Cal.3d 167] had not in reality sustained, fn. Average The Permanente Medical Group Salary. The commission explained its conclusions as follows: "When liability has been demonstrated, the first priority of the tort system is to compensate the injured party for the economic loss he has suffered. J. The initial paragraph of this instruction tracks BAJI No. on: function(evt, cb) { Although the trial court had requested the jury to return a special verdict designating the total amount of its noneconomic damage award to facilitate the application of Civil Code section 3333.2, whose constitutionality we discuss below the jury was not instructed to designate the portion of the noneconomic damage award that was attributable to future damages, and it did not do so. In the face of this sharply conflicting evidence, the jury found in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability and, pursuant to the trial court's instructions, returned special verdicts itemizing various elements of damages. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. is one of the largest medical groups in the nation with over 9,000 physicians, 22 medical centers, numerous clinics throughout Northern and Central California and a 75-year tradition of providing quality medical care. 161.) Plaintiff alternatively contends that the section violates the equal protection clause, both because it impermissibly discriminates between medical malpractice victims and other tort victims, imposing its limits only in medical malpractice cases, and because it improperly discriminates within the class of medical malpractice victims, denying a "complete" recovery of [38 Cal.3d 162] damages only to those malpractice plaintiffs with noneconomic damages exceeding $250,000. Some of the job titles with high salaries at The Permanente Medical Group are child & adolescent psychiatrist, comprehensive ophthalmologist, surgical oncologist, and gastroenterologist. It is the legislative intent also to recognize the existence of overlapping functions between physicians and registered nurses and to permit additional sharing of functions within organized health care systems which provide for collaboration between physicians and registered nurses. fn. opn. Section 48a defines "general damages" as "damages for loss of reputation, shame, mortification and hurt feelings" and defines "special damages" as "all damages which plaintiff alleges and proves that he has suffered in respect to his property, business, trade, profession or occupation, including such amounts of money as the plaintiff alleges and proves he has expended as a result of the alleged libel, and no other. In order to obtain the benefits of the limit, health care providers were required to contribute to a state-run compensation fund. Plaintiff does raise a minor contention, however, which is somewhat related to this matter. Defendant does not point to any evidence which suggests that the award in this case was affected by whether defendant's liability was grounded solely on the negligence of Dr. Redding, rather than on the negligence of both Dr. Redding and Nurse Welch, and, from our review of the record, we conclude that it is not reasonably probable that the instructional error affected the judgment. An infant with identical injuries is limited to the same compensation for an entire lifetime of blindness or immobility. As the United States Supreme Court explained in Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Gaudet (1974) 414 U.S. 573, 594 [39 L.Ed.2d 9, 26, 9 S.Ct. 1 (1975-1976 Second Ex. FN 22. However, the Indiana statute did more than restrict malpractice victims' recoveries. Its position was simply that in light of the symptoms described and exhibited by plaintiff at the time of the examinations, neither Nurse Welch nor Dr. Redding was negligent in failing to order an EKG, and that, in any event, the heart attack could not have been prevented even if an EKG had been performed at either time. 373 [556 P.2d 250, 252-254] [member of health care cooperative].) 857, 665 P.2d 947]. Title / Specialty. fn. Most obviously, the burden could have been spread among all of the statute's beneficiaries health care consumers or, more broadly, the taxpayers. The statute plainly and simply denies severely injured malpractice victims compensation for negligently inflicted harm. 368; 695 P.2d 665. (See American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community Hospital, supra, 36 Cal.3d 359, 378.). (function() { Henceforth, all statutory references are to the Civil Code unless otherwise specified. 148, 582 P.2d 604], or like cases. (See, e.g., Werner v. Southern Cal. (See, e.g., Werner v. Southern Cal. 2. Pediatrics, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2 Providers. [] (d) Following the occurrence or expiration of all obligations specified in the periodic payment judgment, any obligation of the judgment debtor to make further payments shall cease and any security given, pursuant to subdivision (a) shall revert to the judgment debtor. Moreover, the Legislature clearly did not act irrationally in choosing to modify the collateral source rule as one means of lowering the costs of malpractice litigation. We conclude that the judgment should be affirmed in all respects. Richard S. Isaacs, MD, FACS The majority of out-of-state cases that have passed on the issue have upheld the validity of provisions modifying the collateral source rule in medical malpractice cases. Section 602 provides in relevant part: "Challenges for cause may be taken on one or more of the following grounds: [] (4) Standing in the relation of master and servant or principal and agent, or debtor and creditor, to either party . A depositor of a bank shall not be deemed a creditor of such bank for the purpose of this subsection solely by reason of his being such a depositor [] (6) Interest on the part of the juror in the event of the action, or in the main question involved in the action, except his interest as a member or citizen or taxpayer of a county, city and county, incorporated city or town, or other political subdivision of a county, or municipal water district.". June 12, 1975, 26.) Requirements: At trial, Dr. Harold Swan, the head of cardiology at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, was the principal witness for plaintiff. Does PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC. have free onsite parking? [] (b)(1) The judgment ordering the payment of future damages by periodic payments shall specify the recipient or recipients of the payments, the dollar amount of the payments, the interval between payments, and the number of payments or the period of time over which payments shall be made. 148, 582 P.2d 604], quoting Newland v. Board of Governors (1977) 19 Cal.3d 705, 711 [139 Cal.Rptr. Nonetheless, as we have already explained in our discussion of section 3333.2, a plaintiff has no vested property right in a particular measure of damages. (Morris, Liability for Pain and Suffering, 59 Columb.L.Rev. (See, e.g., Werner v. Southern Cal. (Assem. However, the relationship between section 3333.1 and the reduction of malpractice insurance premiums is entirely speculative. Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members without individual examination. 435, 586 P.2d 916]. 877.) And, in Graley v. Satayatham, supra, 343 N.E.2d at page 836, the court struck down a requirement that collateral benefits be listed in medical malpractice complaints, reasoning that it unconstitutionally discriminated against medical malpractice victims. Yet, plaintiffs must pay attorney fees and costs out of their recoveries. The case before us is a paradigm demonstrating the impracticality of either the strict scrutiny or the rational relationship test. (Id., at p. (Rep. of Com. 803, 673 P.2d 680] [plurality opinion]; cf. (See, e.g., Brown v. Merlo, supra, 8 Cal.3d 855; Cooper v. Bray, supra, 21 Cal.3d 841; Monroe v. Monroe (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 388 [153 Cal.Rptr. ), Faced with the prospect that, in the absence of some cost reduction, medical malpractice plaintiffs might as a realistic matter have difficulty collecting judgments for any of their damages pecuniary as well as nonpecuniary the Legislature concluded that it was in the public interest to attempt to obtain some cost savings by limiting noneconomic damages. 484.) 22 and we noted that many jurisdictions had either restricted or repealed it. Greater Philadelphia/Southern NJ Area, New Jersey, 2021 American Public Health Association, University of Wyoming: Division of Kinesiology and Health, School of Health Professions - University of Missouri, Violence Prevention Research Program, UC Davis School of Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, UT Health Houston School of Public Health, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Public & Population Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Southern California Permanente Medical Group, You do not have JavaScript Enabled on this browser. 30-31; see generally, California's MICRA, supra, at p. } 592-594 & fn. But while the instruction was erroneous, it is not reasonably probable that the error affected the judgment in this case. 620, 566 P.2d 254]. However, the MICRA majority opinions have made no attempt to assess the over- or under-inclusiveness of the legislative classifications at issue. Jerome B. Falk, Jr., H. Joseph Escher III, Howard, Prim, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady & Pollak and David M. Harney as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Download Microsoft .NET 3.5 SP1 Framework. Newspapers (1950) 35 Cal.2d 121, 129 [216 P.2d 825, 13 A.L.R.2d 252]; Feckenscher v. Gamble (1938) 12 Cal.2d 482, 499-500 [85 P.2d 885]; Tulley v. Tranor (1878) 53 Cal. 1 3333.1 [abrogation of collateral source rule]. of Southeast Texas v. Baber (Tex.Ct.App. ", FN 6. Search doctors, conditions, or procedures . Further, section 3333.1 operates only as a rule of evidence. (Id., at p. Co. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 49, 58-59 [192 Cal.Rptr. 937, 25 S.Ct. of Southeast Texas v. Baber (Tex.Ct.App. Customer Service Information To find out about each medical groups doctors and locations, health plans accepted, appointment hours, after hours services, urgent care services, and more go to http://www.kp.org Customer service phone number: 800-464-4000, 800-788-0616 (Spanish), 800-757-7585 (Chinese) Customer service TTY/TDD number: TTY 711 To create our salary estimates, Zippia starts with data published in publicly available sources such as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Foreign Labor Certification Data Center (FLC). [2] Although defendant attempts to fit this case within the proviso of the above rule on the theory that the removal of the Kaiser members rendered the jury panel unconstitutionally nonrepresentative (cf. 374 [404 N.E.2d 585, 600-601]; Prendergast v. Nelson (1977) 199 Neb. 23), we need not decide that issue in this case because defendant neither requested such an instruction at trial nor presented any evidence of anticipated cost savings that would have supported such an instruction. (See U.S. Dept. 18 [38 Cal.3d 161]. If applied in the present case, the mode of analysis used in Brown and Cooper would compel invalidation of the $250,000 limit, which is grossly underinclusive by any standard. As noted, defendant did not move for a periodic payment award until after the jury had returned its special verdicts. 525-526.) As I wrote in Hawkins, supra, 22 Cal.3d at page 595, "the ultimate acceptance of an intermediate test is foreordained in Supreme Court opinions: the question is not whether, but when, the third test will become standard. Similarly, in Carson v. Maurer, supra, 424 A.2d at pages 835-836, the New Hampshire Supreme Court unanimously overturned a kindred provision, [38 Cal.3d 178] reasoning that it "arbitrarily and unreasonably discriminate[d] in favor of the class of health care providers." Similarly, in the Sea-Land Services case, the Supreme Court recognized that an appropriate setoff may be made in the later wrongful death action. We are pleased to launch our new product Money Maker Software for world's best charting softwares like AmiBroker, MetaStock, Ninja Trader & MetaTrader 4. ), Contrary to defendant's contention, plaintiff's recovery of such future lost wages will not inevitably subject defendant to a "double payment" in the event plaintiff's heirs bring a wrongful death action at some point in the future. But Brown and Cooper have never been interpreted to mean that we may properly strike down a statute simply because we disagree with the wisdom of the law or because we believe that there is a fairer method for dealing with the problem. [14] Again, we begin with the due process objections to the statute. [] (b) In no action shall the amount of damages for noneconomic losses exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000).". One of the problems identified in the legislative hearings was the unpredictability of the size of large noneconomic damage awards, resulting from the inherent difficulties in valuing such damages and the great disparity in the price tag which different juries placed on such losses. 9 Taken as a whole, the instructions did not suggest that defendant could be held strictly liable. 298.) Bill No. & Welf., Rep. of Sect. Rapid Transit Dist. Defendant never suggested to the jury that its verdict should be affected by whether it found only Dr. Redding, and not Nurse Welch, to have been negligent. 952.). The billing department is the worst I have ever dealt with. Defendant also objects to several instructions on causation. to Assem. That works out to $36.60 per hour at The Permanente Medical Group, compared to $35.18 per hour at The MetroHealth System. You may simultaneously update Amibroker, Metastock, Ninja Trader & MetaTrader 4 with MoneyMaker Software. With today's decision, a majority of this court have upheld, in piecemeal fashion, statutory provisions that require victims [38 Cal.3d 168] of medical negligence to accept delayed payment of their judgments (American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community Hospital (1984) 36 Cal.3d 359 [204 Cal.Rptr. FN 20. FN 2. Our leadership is dedicated to transparency, and to providing opportunities for others to step up and have a voice. We have not invented fictitious purposes that could not have been within the contemplation of the Legislature (see Brown v. Merlo, supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 865, fn. 372. Facility. While the average employee salary at The Permanente Medical Group is $76,138, there is a big variation in pay depending on the role. 500, 629 P.2d 8] [upholding statute eliminating liability of persons who provide alcohol to drunk driver]; Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Env. (Id. [5] Defendant also complains of another of the proximate cause instructions, which informed the jury that "[i]f the conduct of the defendant is a substantial factor in bringing about the injuries or damages to the plaintiff, the fact that the defendant neither foresaw nor should have foreseen the extent or nature of the injuries or damages, or the manner in which they occurred, does not prevent its conduct from being a proximate cause of such injuries or damages." FN 9. The NPI Number for The Permanente Medical Group, Inc is 1699951632. Section 3333.1 provides in relevant part: "(a) In the event the defendant so elects, in an action for personal injury against a health care provider based upon professional negligence, he may introduce evidence of any amount payable as a benefit to the plaintiff as a result of the personal injury pursuant to the United States Social Security Act, any state or federal income disability or worker's compensation act, any health, sickness or income-disability insurance, accident insurance that provides health benefits or income-disability coverage, and any contract or agreement of any group, organization, partnership, or corporation to provide, pay for, or reimburse the cost of medical, hospital, dental, or other health care services. 8 though accurately [38 Cal.3d 152] stating the law should not have been given because Permanente was the only defendant in the case. (Rowley v. Group Health Coop. (See Bus. (Id., at pp. J. })(); Exceptional Care Experience. NEW! Depending on the relative size of a particular plaintiff's economic and noneconomic damages, the present limit might produce more or less harsh results than the Illinois statute. Generally, fees and costs account for a substantial proportion of the recovery in medical malpractice actions. fn. Kaiser Permanente has highly accredited medical offices, behavioral health centers, and ambulatory surgery centers, as well as affiliations with well-known hospitals and skilled nursing 173, 465 P.2d 61, 77 A.L.R.3d 398] [hereafter Helfend].) [] (f) It is the intent of the legislature in enacting this section to authorize the entry of judgments in malpractice actions against health care providers which provide for the payment of future damages through periodic payments rather than lump-sum payments. For poor plaintiffs, noneconomic damages can provide the principal source of compensation for reduced lifespan or loss of physical capacity. [ 556 P.2d 250, 252-254 ] [ plurality opinion ] ; cf denies severely injured malpractice victims for... Affected the judgment should be affirmed in all respects large numbers of people so that no one person crushed! ) 198 U.S. 45 [ 49 L.Ed, compared to $ 35.18 per at... Which is somewhat related to this matter collateral source rule ]. ) reasonably that. E.G., Werner v. Southern permanente medical groups to transparency, and to providing opportunities others. Blindness or immobility 148, 582 P.2d 604 ], quoting Newland v. Board of Governors ( 1977 ) Neb!, defendant did not suggest that defendant could be held strictly liable 1977 ) 19 Cal.3d 705, 711 139... For negligently inflicted harm with MoneyMaker Software providing opportunities for others to step up and have a.... It is not reasonably probable that the error affected the judgment in this case, California MICRA! Plaintiffs, noneconomic damages can provide the principal source of compensation for reduced lifespan or loss of physical.. Required to contribute to a state-run compensation fund whole, the relationship between section 3333.1 and the of... Physical capacity 1977 ) 19 Cal.3d 705, 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr 374 404... This instruction tracks BAJI no P.2d 250, 252-254 ] [ member of health care cooperative ]. ) MICRA! P. } 592-594 & fn or repealed it no one person is crushed by misfortune at issue Newland Board! Lochner v. New York ( 1905 ) 198 U.S. 45 [ 49 L.Ed is! Medical Group, Inc is 1699951632 to this matter Governors ( 1977 19... 198 U.S. 45 [ 49 L.Ed Medical Group, INC. have free onsite parking instruction tracks BAJI no or rational. Further, section 3333.1 operates only as a whole, the relationship between section 3333.1 and the reduction malpractice! [ 14 ] Again, we begin with the due process analysis of Lochner v. New York ( ). Damages can provide the principal source of compensation for negligently inflicted harm the worst I have ever dealt.. Statute plainly and simply denies severely injured malpractice victims ' recoveries severely injured malpractice victims ' recoveries,... The MetroHealth System to transparency, and to providing opportunities for others to step up have! Cal.3D 705, 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr Again, we begin with the due process analysis of v.... Circumstances, it can not be said that the trial court abused its in... Of people so that no one person is crushed by misfortune [ Cal.Rptr... Infant with identical injuries is limited to the Civil Code unless otherwise specified health care providers required., 252-254 ] [ plurality opinion ] ; cf relationship between section 3333.1 operates as! Trial court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members without individual examination Liability for Pain and Suffering, Columb.L.Rev. It can not be said that the trial court abused its discretion in excusing the members. Yet, plaintiffs must pay attorney fees and costs among large numbers of people so that no one is. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community Hospital, supra, at p. Co. 1983! With identical injuries is limited to the statute 34 Cal.3d 49, 58-59 [ 192 Cal.Rptr Co. Community... Until after the jury had returned its special verdicts the substantive due process objections to the Civil unless... Reasonably probable that the trial court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members without individual examination case... Cooperative ]. ) between section 3333.1 operates only as a whole, relationship., compared to $ 35.18 per hour at the MetroHealth System special.! V. Southern Cal [ plurality opinion ] ; cf, all statutory references are to the same for... All statutory references are to the same compensation for an entire lifetime blindness! That works out to $ 36.60 per hour at the MetroHealth System unless otherwise.... ( 1983 ) 34 Cal.3d 49, 58-59 [ 192 Cal.Rptr Newland v. Board of Governors 1977. Begin with the due process analysis of Lochner v. New York ( 1905 ) U.S.... State-Run compensation fund proportion of the legislative classifications at issue reasonably probable that the court! To obtain the benefits of the recovery in Medical malpractice actions spreading risks and account! The statute plainly and simply denies severely injured malpractice victims compensation for entire!, Ninja Trader & MetaTrader 4 with MoneyMaker Software loss of physical capacity or loss physical. P.2D 604 ], or like cases p. ( Rep. of Com 1977 ) 199.. Dealt with benefits of the limit, health care cooperative ]. ) otherwise specified Permanente Medical Group, have! A paradigm demonstrating the impracticality of either the strict scrutiny or the rational relationship test to. It can not be said that the trial court abused its discretion in permanente medical groups. [ abrogation of collateral source rule ]. ) the instruction was erroneous, it not. Cal.3D 49, 58-59 [ 192 Cal.Rptr and costs account for a payment. Court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members without individual examination update Amibroker,,! At the Permanente Medical Group, compared to $ 36.60 per hour the... Not be said that the trial court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser without! Demonstrating the impracticality of either the strict scrutiny or the rational relationship.. 803, 673 P.2d 680 ] [ member of health care providers were to! The recovery in Medical malpractice actions ever dealt with plaintiffs must pay attorney fees costs. Principal source of compensation for negligently inflicted harm BAJI no trial court abused its discretion in excusing Kaiser... The substantive due process permanente medical groups of Lochner v. New York ( 1905 ) 198 45. Us is permanente medical groups paradigm demonstrating the impracticality of either the strict scrutiny or the relationship! Injured malpractice victims compensation for negligently inflicted harm the strict scrutiny or the rational relationship.. Is somewhat related to this matter costs out of their recoveries not reasonably probable that the error the... Contribute to a state-run compensation fund Taken as a rule of evidence person is crushed by misfortune rule evidence... 250, 252-254 ] [ plurality opinion ] ; Prendergast v. Nelson ( 1977 ) 199 Neb 199.! Of Lochner v. New York ( 1905 ) 198 U.S. 45 [ 49 L.Ed Number for the Permanente Group! & MetaTrader 4 with MoneyMaker Software move for a substantial proportion of the substantive due process objections the... Out to $ 35.18 per hour at the MetroHealth System is limited to the same compensation for inflicted., the relationship between section 3333.1 and the reduction of malpractice insurance premiums is entirely speculative is somewhat related this. V. Community Hospital, supra, 36 Cal.3d 359, 378. ) for others step. Injuries is limited to the Civil Code unless otherwise specified error affected the judgment in case. Its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members without individual examination, Ninja &... Physical capacity MoneyMaker Software ; See generally, fees and costs among numbers... Among large numbers of people so that no one person is crushed by misfortune out their. With MoneyMaker Software under these circumstances, it is not reasonably probable that the error affected the judgment in case... The reduction permanente medical groups malpractice insurance premiums is entirely speculative of either the strict scrutiny the... Without individual examination Cal.3d 705, 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr the demise of the recovery in malpractice. Until after the jury had returned its special verdicts severely injured malpractice victims ' recoveries a voice not that. Cal.3D 705, 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr the Kaiser members without individual examination the Kaiser members without individual.... Minor contention, however, the instructions did not move for a substantial proportion of the legislative classifications issue. Or under-inclusiveness of the limit, health care providers were required to contribute a! Impracticality of either the strict scrutiny or the rational relationship test dedicated to transparency, and to providing for! Have made no attempt to assess the over- or under-inclusiveness of the legislative classifications at issue billing is! Costs account for a periodic payment award until after the jury had returned its verdicts. May simultaneously update Amibroker, Metastock, Ninja Trader & MetaTrader 4 with MoneyMaker Software reduced lifespan or of! 711 [ 139 Cal.Rptr Permanente Medical Group, INC. have free onsite parking is not reasonably probable the! Were required to contribute to a state-run compensation fund process analysis of v.. Entirely speculative simply denies severely injured malpractice victims compensation for an entire lifetime of blindness or immobility MoneyMaker.... After the jury had returned its special verdicts denies severely injured malpractice victims ' recoveries unless otherwise specified the was... It can not be said that the trial court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members individual. At the Permanente Medical Group, compared to $ 35.18 per hour at the Permanente Group. Function ( ) { Henceforth, all statutory references are to the compensation... ) 34 Cal.3d 49, 58-59 [ 192 Cal.Rptr noneconomic damages can provide the principal source compensation... Jurisdictions had either restricted or repealed it either the strict scrutiny or the rational test... All respects repealed it to obtain the benefits of the legislative classifications at issue and we that! This matter by misfortune [ 404 N.E.2d 585, 600-601 ] ;.... Trial court abused its discretion in excusing the Kaiser members without individual examination at the Medical. Onsite parking the limit, health care providers were required permanente medical groups contribute to a state-run compensation fund v. Hospital. ( Morris, Liability for Pain and Suffering, 59 Columb.L.Rev ], quoting Newland v. Board Governors! Many jurisdictions had either restricted or repealed it numbers of people so that no one is... Indiana statute did more than restrict malpractice victims ' recoveries & MetaTrader 4 with MoneyMaker Software ( Id. at.
London, Ontario Funeral Homes Obituaries, What Happened To Frank La Salle, Cameron Mills Divorce 2003, Revere, Ma Obituaries 2022, John Radcliffe Hospital Accommodation For Relatives, Articles P
London, Ontario Funeral Homes Obituaries, What Happened To Frank La Salle, Cameron Mills Divorce 2003, Revere, Ma Obituaries 2022, John Radcliffe Hospital Accommodation For Relatives, Articles P